Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Whiskey Producers Using Factory Refuse As Clean Energy

Brown liquor and renewable energy, these are a few of my favorite things...

The Scottish island of Islay is home to some of the world's most prestigious whisky brands. But power cuts disrupt production so often that one of the distilleries is now transforming distillery waste into green energy.


GiddyUp; A Google Green Welcome Back

Today’s the day we bring it back. As per usual, I go off the radar and then come back with a new burst of energy. Well here’s the rebirth part VII. Smarter, fast, stronger. Oooorah.


Let's come back with a great interview from two of Google's leading Green execs....

Google Inc. often strays from its core mission of organizing the world's information online.
But investing in green, or renewable, energy is the company's most prominent real-world endeavor.
GOGREEN

Google Inc.
Bill Weihl, left, and Rick Needham

In addition to reducing its own "carbon footprint" through solar panels atop its Mountain View, Calif., headquarters, and increasing the energy efficiency of its data centers, Google's initiatives include developing technology that could cut the cost of building solar thermal power plants. It developed software that shows consumers how much energy they use at home and invested more than $85 million in early-stage solar thermal, wind and geothermal tech companies. It just signed a landmark 20-year contract to buy energy from a wind farm in Iowa, where Google has a data center. And the company got attention earlier this fall by announcing a multimillion-dollar investment in a planned offshore wind-energy project called the Atlantic Wind Connection.
The Wall Street Journal sat down with Bill Weihl, Google's green energy czar, and Rick Needham, green operations business chief, to talk about Google's investments in the wind market and solar technology. Here are edited excerpts of the conversation.

Riding the Wind

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: Why do you make investments in wind projects that won't directly result in cheaper energy prices for Google?
MR. WEIHL: Our goal is to solve long-term problems in the world or set the company up for long-term growth. We took a risk around our data centers to improve energy efficiency, and that panned out really well. We experiment in investments, like with the Atlantic Wind Connection. There's a risk there, and all sorts of reasons why that project might stall at some point. But it could be very catalytic, enabling enormous innovation. Some projects may fail, but venture capitalists do that all the time.
MR. NEEDHAM: We thought, "There are a lot of capital constraints for getting good projects built. Why don't we give more capital?" We've made two investments and are in the midst of looking at several deals. The first investment we did was a tax equity deal in a North Dakota wind farm for $39 million, where we get tax credits as part of the investment.… There aren't a lot of tax equity investments anymore. Ours was the first such deal in 18 months.

WSJ: Do you think about your return on investment?
MR. NEEDHAM: Yes. We don't share ROI publicly, but the returns are good enough that we're willing to invest.
WSJ: Why did you sign a power purchase agreement with a wind farm in Iowa?
MR. WEIHL: The wind PPA [power purchase agreement] is not an investment. We made a 20-year commitment to buy [electricity] from that wind farm. That's very different from how people buy energy credits. This is the only way realistically for a developer to have the certainty of a contract with a credit-worthy counterparty. They can get debt financing and free up money for another project.
For us, it's a hedge against rising energy prices over the long term. We're not disclosing details of the contract, but it starts out with a slow escalation [in price]. It's a much slower escalation than we would expect to see in the energy markets in general. For our data centers, we already have power contracts in place. So if we sign that power purchase agreement today, we're buying that power but we can't use it. We can sell the energy on the wholesale market.
This is a structure that not many other people thought about. Contractually it wasn't simple. There was a lot of work in sorting it out. But it will be easier for us the second time around.

Doing It With Mirrors
WSJ: Tell me about your solar thermal technology project.
MR. WEIHL: We're not yet ready to disclose details. The fundamentals are we're developing solar thermal power generation to concentrate the sun's rays and generate hundreds of megawatts through mirrors called heliostats.

WSJ: Can clean energy technology become a core business?
MR. WEIHL: We're not an energy company and don't have such ambitions, but we want to help drive technology. I think that in a couple of years, we'll have [solar thermal] technology ready to be commercialized. Most likely we'd license it to get it to market. Renewable-energy technology that competes head to head with coal without subsidies will make a lot of money.

WSJ: What roadblocks do other companies face in making their facilities energy-efficient?
MR. WEIHL: We have dozens of engineers working on it. In many organizations you find that the person who [runs] facilities and has that budget is different from the person who pays operating costs. At Google on the data-center side, [one person] owns facilities and the operational costs to run those facilities. They focus on the total cost of ownership.
They can say, "I'm going to build this thing to last for five or 10 years, what's the cost going to be?" In many companies those things don't happen.

WSJ: Which companies do you admire for their "green" work?
MR. WEIHL: Wal-Mart does a lot with cutting waste in their supply chain and packaging. They had an initiative to get their suppliers to report to the Carbon Disclosure Project, a reporting mechanism to measure their carbon footprint. They have 100,000 suppliers.
MR. NEEDHAM: Procter & Gamble. They have good goals. Like their development of Tide [laundry detergent] that works with cold water. And they're driving their supply chains to think about carbon and sustainability.

Monday, September 13, 2010

YouTube Live Streaming Starts at 8am PST

Well, for a two day test that is. YouTube has moved slowly into the live streaming. How do you think it will pan out?


Check out the schedule below to see if any of the programming tickles your fancy.

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Are You A Seller Or A Marketer?

No no, don't get me wrong, one isn't better or worse than the other. I've been having a rash of conversations lately about sales style, sales strategy, sales tactics, sales, sales SALES. And I don't even think I consider myself a salesman. But I think we should all understand the distinction between the two types of people who do this day in day out. No matter what part of the digital business you play in, be it agency, publisher, tech vendor, or creative, we all sell something. So in my opinion, there are two types of salespeople:

1) The Salesman (or woman)
It's Alec Baldwin in Glengarry. It's Brian Dennehy in Tommy Boy. These cats can sell online ad space, fur coats, rich media, design elements, grape sodas and a bucket of chicken. They just have it. People inherently trust them and they listen to people's problems. A true sale is an unbelievable process to watch. It's action-reaction, it's quick thinking, it's knowing the asker's question before you even hear it. These people are pillars in the online ad game, and no matter where they go, they always have a book of business from people who KNOW they won't be steered wrong. These people are polished, structured, buttoned up. I envy these people.


2) The Marketer
Marketers don't just consider the final sale, they understand the marketing umbrella, and where advertising plays a role. They think about the brand, the product, the customer, the market, the competitors, the look, the feel, the taste (maybe?). A true marketer understands these pieces, and recognizes that sales is either a natural byproduct, or a necessary evil. Marketers fall on both sides of the supply-demand conversation in advertising. Some straddle that line and bounce back and forth based on their recent employment opportunity. For better or worse, these are tactical problem solvers, and consider the big picture.

Let me repeat; I don't consider one stronger than the other. And I'm not making a plea to be bucketed or to bucket anyone. I just wanted to talk about the difference and the importance of both in advertising.

So who are you?


Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Awesome New Eminem and Rhianna Song

I am indeed a sucker for a beautiful hook, well sung chorus, and tough Eminem verse....

Monday, May 24, 2010

Awesome U2 "With Or Without You" Cover on Joost

<a href="http://www.joost.com/3701uu35">We Are The Fallen: Mashup Mondays</a>